All English 4U · CELPIP General · Set 8
Reading Practice Test 1
Small Changes, Shared Places
4 parts · 38 questions · about 55 minutes. Read each text and choose the best option. Use the information in the text; do not rely on outside knowledge.
Reading Correspondence
Suggested reading time: 10 minutes

From: Elena Ruiz, costume coordinator
To: Harbourlight Players
Subject: Returning costumes after The Last Lantern
Hello everyone,
Thank you for making our spring production such a success. We need to check the borrowed costumes before another theatre collects them. Please bring your items to Westside Community Theatre on Tuesday, June 16, between 5:30 and 7:30 p.m. The collection room is beside Studio B. Use the Alder Street entrance because a delivery will be using the loading door. This is a return session, not the rehearsal mentioned in last week’s message. The rehearsal will still take place next week, and you should keep your script binders until then.
Before arriving, compare what you have with the inventory sheet in your costume bag. Put clothing on hangers and place small accessories in clear bags labelled with the costume number. Please attach labels to the bags, rather than directly to the fabric. If a piece is missing, do not replace it with something from your own wardrobe. Instead, write down its inventory number and the last scene in which you remember using it. That information helps us search the correct backstage area before contacting the lending theatre.
We expect ordinary wear after several performances. Mark loose buttons and small seam splits with a yellow tag; volunteer menders will deal with these later. Damp or stained pieces should go on the ventilated rack, away from the clean clothing. Please do not wash any costume yourself, even if the outside fabric appears washable. Some have special linings or attached decorations that need a different cleaning process. There will be no charge for reporting ordinary wear, so there is no reason to conceal a small repair.
Two tables will be ready inside the collection room. The long table is for checked clothing, and the smaller one is for accessories and paperwork. The blue storybook and umbrella are stage props rather than costume accessories, but please return them to the smaller table too. Add a note marked ‘props’ so our property volunteer can collect them separately. Allow about ten minutes for checking, and keep your inventory sheet until a volunteer has initialled it.
If Tuesday is impossible, email me by noon on Monday, June 15. I can arrange access to a return box inside the locked office on Wednesday. This option must be agreed in advance; it is not an unattended lobby drop-off. The box will be collected at 6 p.m. on Wednesday. Please do not leave borrowed items outside the office, in the lobby or beside Studio B. A friend may bring your bag on Tuesday, provided your costume number and inventory sheet are included.
Many thanks,
Elena
Choose the best answer.
What is Elena mainly trying to achieve?
Why should actors use the Alder Street entrance?
What should an actor do about a missing costume piece?
Which item should an actor retain for next week?
Why does Elena ask actors not to wash the costumes?
How can someone arrange the Wednesday alternative?
Read a performer’s reply and choose the best phrase for each gap.
I can attend on Tuesday, so I will bring my costume . My small accessories will be . One seam has split, so I will . I also have the storybook; I will put it . I will keep the inventory sheet until .
Thanks,
Marcus
The opening explains that borrowed costumes must be checked before another theatre collects them. Rehearsal is a separate event; buying replacements is explicitly discouraged.
A delivery will use the loading door during the return session. Neither a moved room nor a closure of Studio B is stated, and the session ends at 7:30.
Elena asks for the item number and last remembered scene so the team can search backstage. Personal substitutes and unattended lobby returns are prohibited.
The rehearsal is next week and actors should keep script binders until then. Props must be returned, and the inventory is kept only until checked and initialled.
Special linings and decorations may need a different cleaning process even when the outer fabric seems washable. The email encourages honest reporting of wear.
Wednesday office-box access requires prior agreement by email before Monday noon. A friend may return items on Tuesday, but that does not arrange Wednesday access.
The standard Tuesday return window is 5:30–7:30 p.m. Monday noon concerns requesting an alternative, while Wednesday 6 p.m. is the box collection time.
Accessories belong in clear bags labelled with the costume number. The email rejects labels directly on fabric and does not substitute a performer name for that number.
Small seam splits should be marked yellow for volunteer menders. Washing, personal replacements and leaving borrowed items outside the room conflict with the instructions.
The storybook is a stage prop and goes to the smaller accessories-and-paperwork table with a props note. The rack is for damp or stained clothing.
A volunteer initials the inventory after checking. This is separate from keeping script binders for rehearsal and from the alternative Wednesday return arrangement.
Reading to Apply a Diagram
Suggested reading time: 8 minutes
Westside Repair Café: Saturday, July 11
Choose a session below. Numbers in the booking column are the maximum group sizes. Where a deadline is shown, book by 5 p.m. on that date; those sessions do not accept walk-ins. A place is confirmed only when the café replies. Sessions marked ‘no booking’ admit people in arrival order up to their listed capacity. All sessions are free. Teaching takes place with a volunteer; successful repair is not guaranteed. Read the item restrictions before booking.
| Session | Time | Room | Capacity / booking | Bring / note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small appliances | 9:00–10:15 a.m. | Workshop A | 8 people; book by July 8 | One unplugged item; no microwaves |
| Clothing patching | 9:30–10:30 a.m. | Textile Room | 10 people; walk-in if space | Clean garment and matching thread |
| Bicycle puncture demonstration | 10:45–11:30 a.m. | Courtyard | 12 people; no booking | Practice wheels supplied; leave your bicycle at home |
| Lamp inspection | 11:45 a.m.–1:00 p.m. | Workshop B | 6 people; book by July 8 | One unplugged lamp; damaged cords are not accepted |
| Chair tightening | 1:15–2:30 p.m. | Workshop A | 8 people; book by July 9 | One chair or a sample of its loose joint |
| Tool care talk | 2:00–2:45 p.m. | Meeting Room | 16 people; no booking | Discussion and demonstration only; do not bring blades |
The courtyard demonstration moves to the Covered Hall if it rains; its time and capacity stay the same. No other room changes are planned. Volunteers cannot store items between sessions. If you attend two activities, take your belongings with you.
Read this email to a friend and choose details supported by the programme.
For your torn clean jacket, the most suitable session is . If you cannot book in advance, you could . I want to watch the bicycle demonstration. If it rains, I should go to . We can both watch because . Later, I would like help with a loose chair. To request a place I must book .
See you there,
Ari
Choose the best answer.
Which two complete sessions could one person attend without overlap and finish both before noon?
Someone has an unplugged lamp with a visibly damaged cord. What does the programme indicate?
Which statement about the Chair tightening session is supported?
Clothing patching works on clean garments and asks for matching thread. The other named sessions concern lamps, tools or furniture rather than fabric.
Clothing patching allows walk-ins if space remains. The lamp and appliance sessions have a July 8 deadline and do not allow walk-ins.
The note beneath the table moves only the courtyard demonstration to the Covered Hall in rain. Its scheduled time and capacity remain unchanged.
The bicycle demonstration supplies practice wheels and asks attendees to leave bicycles at home. Its capacity is twelve, and the café cannot store belongings.
Chair tightening has a July 9 deadline, and the introductory note sets all dated deadlines at 5 p.m. July 8 applies to the two electrical sessions.
Clothing patching ends at 10:30 and the bicycle demonstration starts at 10:45, ending at 11:30. The first two pairs overlap; the last pair finishes after noon.
The lamp row explicitly excludes damaged cords. Unplugging the item does not remove this restriction, and neither priority service nor storage is offered.
The chair row permits a whole chair or a sample of its loose joint. It uses Workshop A, and the general note makes clear that repair is not guaranteed.
Reading for Information
Suggested reading time: 9 minutes
A. Counting a changing resource
Northpoint’s new tree inventory will record trees on public streets and in municipal parks. Private gardens and school grounds fall outside its boundary, even when their trees are visible from a pavement. Volunteers work in pairs, measuring trunk circumference and canopy width and recording a likely species. An uncertain identification is marked ‘unconfirmed’ and supported by a photograph. Guessing would give the appearance of precision while weakening later comparisons. The map represents conditions on the survey date; it is not a certificate of a tree’s health. Planners expect to repeat the survey every three years, an interval intended to reveal meaningful change without demanding an annual count from volunteers. Each trunk receives a point, while shared-root stems are described in a separate note.
B. Making records useful
The public map will show species, size bands and survey year. Working records also contain the survey date and the pair’s initials, allowing a coordinator to query an unclear entry without publishing personal contact details. Residents may suggest corrections through a web form, but a suggestion remains provisional until someone checks the tree on site. A photograph alone may not settle a disagreement about measurements. Reports of damage are observations rather than diagnoses, and the inventory team does not schedule pruning. It can refer a concern to the relevant city department through the existing reporting channel. Residents should therefore avoid treating a new dot or note on the map as a promise that maintenance has been booked.
C. From measurement to decisions
The inventory can identify blocks with relatively little canopy and start discussion about future planting. However, a pale area on a shade map does not automatically offer a suitable planting site. Staff must examine underground services, drainage, pavement width and the space available for roots. Empty tree pits are recorded on a separate layer and do not increase the count of living trees. A proposed school measurement demonstration will teach the method, but its results will not enter the municipal inventory because school grounds are outside the survey boundary. The city has promised no planting timetable. The first practical value of the project is a shared starting point for decisions, rather than an immediate list of holes to fill.
D. Keeping the method consistent
The library will lend measuring tapes, clipboards and identification cards, and new volunteers can attend a one-hour orientation. Experienced pairs will revisit a sample of blocks to see whether different teams have applied the same measuring method. Weather and leaf conditions are noted because a tree can be harder to identify after its leaves have fallen. When an entry is corrected, its previous version stays in a dated history instead of disappearing. This allows later users to distinguish a changed tree from a changed record. The pilot will combine a city map with a printed library summary. A review after the first survey will consider whether the instructions need simplifying before the next round.
Select the paragraph containing the information. Choose E only if it is not given anywhere.
The planned interval balances detecting change against the effort required to collect data.
Uncertainty about identification should remain visible in the data.
A resident’s suggested change must be verified at the actual location.
An apparent gap in tree cover may still be unsuitable for a new tree.
New participants can borrow equipment and learn the method before surveying.
Locations without a living tree are mapped without being included in the living-tree total.
A note about damage does not mean that repair work has been scheduled.
The completed survey found exactly forty-two different tree species.
Earlier data remain available so users can tell an altered record from an altered tree.
A sets a three-year repeat interval and explains the balance between useful comparisons and volunteer effort. D discusses checking methods, rather than the repeat schedule.
A requires an unconfirmed label and a supporting photograph for uncertain species. This prevents a guess from appearing more precise than the evidence permits.
B says web-form corrections remain provisional until an on-site check. A describes initial measurements, while D concerns retaining earlier versions after correction.
C lists underground services, drainage, pavement width and root space as checks. The shade map starts discussion but cannot determine planting suitability on its own.
D describes library loans and a one-hour orientation for new volunteers. The other paragraphs cover scope, records and planting decisions rather than practical preparation.
C places empty tree pits on a separate layer and excludes them from the living-tree count. A concerns how existing trunks and shared-root stems are recorded.
B distinguishes an observation and referral from a maintenance booking. It specifically warns residents against interpreting a map note as a scheduled pruning visit.
No paragraph provides a completed species total. The text describes a forthcoming inventory and likely species records, so the exact number forty-two has no evidence.
D retains corrected entries in a dated history and explains why that matters. B discusses verifying a proposed correction, rather than preserving past versions.
Reading for Viewpoints
Suggested reading time: 12 minutes

A place at the table
Northpoint’s parks office is considering a small picnic-table reservation trial at two busy parks next summer. No tables or booking hours have been selected. An open meeting in September will collect comments before the office chooses sites. Until a trial is formally announced, every table will remain available in arrival order. Three residents explain what they hope the discussion will address.
Jordan Lee, regular park visitor: ‘My family often decides to go out after seeing the weather. We cannot always plan a week ahead. A reservation sign beside an empty table can make an ordinary visitor feel that the park is an event venue. Someone may stand while a table waits for a group that never arrives. I would keep most tables available in arrival order. If the office tests reservations, it should use only a few tables and release an unused booking after a short grace period. Clear signs need to say when anyone can sit down. Before expanding the system, publish how often reserved tables were actually occupied. A long list of bookings would not by itself show that people benefited.’
Priya Nair, walking-club coordinator: ‘Our members arrive by bus carrying shared refreshments. We have twice found every table occupied, and some members find eating while standing difficult. A limited reservation option would help us choose a reliable meeting place. I do not want every bench booked. Leave open tables for spontaneous visitors and make booking free, so planning ahead does not become a privilege that people purchase. People should be able to book online or by phone, with one simple cancellation procedure. If we cancel, another group should be able to use the space. A reservation would solve one practical problem for our club without requiring the whole park to operate on appointments.’
Sam Ortega, neighbourhood volunteer: ‘I could support a trial, provided we measure more than the number of online requests. Staff will have to answer calls, change signs and deal with disagreements. We should track that workload alongside attendance and ask whether people without internet access can use the system easily. The trial should include a visible timetable, a telephone route and a clear way to report maintenance problems. Reservations will not mend a loose bench or remove litter. After several months, a public report should cover usage, fairness, cleaning and repair needs before recommending any expansion.’
The parks office says it will bring a draft set of questions to the September meeting, rather than ask residents to approve a finished booking system. Staff will record suggestions from people who attend and accept written comments for a further week. They will then publish a response explaining which suggestions shaped the trial design. The discussion is about testing a limited change; no decision to reserve every table has been made.
Choose the best answer.
What stage has the reservation proposal reached?
What distinction matters most to Jordan when judging success?
What is Priya’s main reason for supporting some reservations?
What would Sam add to an evaluation based only on booking requests?
Which position is shared by Jordan and Priya?
Complete a reader’s comment using ideas supported by the article.
No tables or hours are selected, and September comments precede site choice. The article presents a proposed limited trial rather than an operating or permanent system.
Jordan warns that a long booking list does not prove benefit and asks for actual occupancy figures. The concern is unused space being withheld from spontaneous visitors.
Priya describes bus arrivals and difficulty when all tables are occupied. A reliable meeting place helps her club, while she explicitly preserves open tables and free booking.
Sam asks for workload, accessibility, usage, fairness, cleaning and repair information. Booking-request counts alone do not reveal these effects or physical maintenance problems.
Jordan would keep most tables in arrival order, and Priya explicitly wants open tables for spontaneous visitors. Neither supports reserving all space or restricting users to bus groups.
Jordan imagines visitors standing while an empty reserved table waits for a group that never arrives. The article does not connect this concern to fees or weather closure.
Priya supports free online or phone reservations for a few tables while leaving others open. Her explicit cancellation procedure also allows space to become available again.
Sam says reservations will not mend a loose bench or remove litter. He wants maintenance reporting and evaluation alongside booking, not an assumption that reservations repair facilities.
The final paragraph accepts written comments for a further week after the meeting. It does not offer immediate reservations, a binding vote or individual site-selection power.
The article states that every table remains available in arrival order until a trial is formally announced. Sites and booking hours have not yet been selected.
Submit to grade your whole test, OR use 👁 Show Answer per part / per question.
Revealing an answer does not fill the answer field or earn credit.
Review your reading strategies
Start with the purpose and shape of each text. Locate evidence, compare conditions, and choose the option that fits the entire message. Familiar words in a distractor are not enough. Suggested part times cover answering; use the remaining time within about 55 minutes for checking.
Part 1: Track purpose and exceptions
Read who is writing, why and what action is needed. Make a short timeline before answering. Here, the standard return window, alternative-arrangement deadline and box-collection time serve different purposes. Read the complete reply around each gap before choosing a phrase.
Part 2: Read across the whole row
Find the relevant activity, then check time, room, capacity, booking deadline and item restrictions. Read notes below the table: a weather exception may change location without changing time. To test overlap, compare one session’s ending time with the next starting time.
Part 3: Match meaning and check absence
Give each paragraph a short function label before matching statements. A paraphrase may express a detail without repeating its vocabulary. For E, check all four paragraphs: a plausible figure is not evidence. Separate what data describe from what decisions or services they can guarantee.
Part 4: Separate a position from its conditions
Note what each speaker supports, why, and under what limits. Several people may support a limited trial for different reasons. Distinguish proposals from current arrangements and a consultation from a final decision. For comment gaps, require both grammatical fit and support from the article.
After grading, explain why each distractor fails. Your raw practice score is not an official CELPIP level.
